We learned that provincial-peak opportunity replacing benefits from upcoming fuels were quite smaller compared to men and women estimated regarding latest fuels (Fig

Including, the greater Recovery scenario was believed to boost the fresh new ratio regarding logs from inside the lower levels which means cure overall average diary costs, due to the fact Limited Harvest condition is actually thought to lessen the newest part of the market leading-degree logs, which and additionally eradicate total mediocre diary costs

I noticed reasonable and high replacement advantages throughout the analyses just like the suspicion throughout the substitution professionals causes suspicion during the mitigation performance to own opportunity and issues . 4), but modern-day fuels got deeper local distinction, especially for nations with a high commercial time request and you will lowest people, much like the findings off an early on study . For the secluded organizations, energy have fun with is changing compliment of several apps (brand new Clean Time to own Rural and you can Secluded Groups (CERRC) system , the newest Indigenous Regarding-Diesel Step , plus 2018 the latest CleanBC package announced the goal to minimize by the 2030 the fresh new diesel practices in-off-grid organizations because of the 80%.

Uncertainty on replacement positives to own wood affairs are assessed of the having fun with highest and you may low replacement benefits to own sawnwood and boards. A recently available post on degree with assessed replacing benefits to have wood , discover an average product displacement component that is within the diversity off philosophy included in this research, but more information on displacement issues by the commodity sort of and country is of use, and additionally more information on prevent-uses and you may associated unit lifetimes (age.grams. [5, 8]). Details about replacing advantages having pulp and you can report is bound, therefore believed there’s no substitution benefit, however, given the ratio out of C inside classification (25% in order to 34% away from wood commodities), polishing these activities might have high affects on the internet GHG prevention. Regardless of the concerns regarding the actual magnitude regarding replacement positives, our results obviously reveal that deeper mitigation pros is possible thanks to policies one (1) help the C maintenance amount of time in harvested timber situations because of the favouring long-resided more brief-lived points also bioenergy, and (2) enable the access to timber situations to change emission-intensive information, e.g. on strengthening field.

Getting upcoming analyses, it would be beneficial to has spatial information on future people and you will commercial gas mileage for each fossil fuel

In terms of the economic analyses, similar studies have compared mitigation costs for various mitigation scenarios at the national scale and for specific activities [45, 56, 68]. In this study, we used regionally differentiated economic assumptions by three broad regions (northern interior, southern interior, coastal region) as well as at the timber supply area (TSA) level for the Bioenergy scenarios in order to capture the spatial variation in market price and production cost (Additional file 1: Table S9). The cost and price assumptions associated with the bioenergy scenarios and the substitution effects were TSA-specific depending on residue availability, bioenergy facility type, transportation distance (simple estimates), and fuel mix. We assumed that log prices would be affected if harvest shifted among log grades due to mitigation scenarios. However, no change in market prices of HWP was assumed in any scenario because HWP prices are usually determined by large-scale markets while log markets are relatively regional. Costs related to forest management were affected if harvest activities were altered by mitigation scenarios, for instance, logging costs increased in conservation scenarios because more dispersed cut blocks were needed to keep the same harvest characteristics (e.g., diameters, tree species, etc.). We also assumed a fixed $50/tCO₂e carbon price over the entire period for slashburning as a penalty in the baseline to reflect a possible policy change to include slashburning in BC’s existing carbon pricing . Manufacturing costs were also impacted by changes in production efficiency that then depend on the availability of input materials. Additional recovered fiber under Higher Utilization was assumed to be used in HWP following the same proportions as in the baseline, thus a lower manufacturing cost was assumed for pulp and paper production due to higher efficiency, but a higher manufacturing cost for solid wood products because of lower log quality. Similarly, higher manufacturing costs were assumed for all HWP in the conservation scenarios due to lower efficiency. In the LLP scenario, we assumed economy of scales increased manufacturing costs of pulp and paper (+ 2%) and decreased costs for solid wood products (? 2%) .